KOM611 - HARMONY TEACHING TECHNIQUES
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARMONY TEACHING TECHNIQUES | KOM611 | Any Semester/Year | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Prequisites | ||||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Drill and Practice | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Prof. Metin Munzur, Prof. Levent Kuterdem, Prof. Onur Özmen | |||||
| Course objective | To enable the acquisation of giving lecture in the field of harmony education. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Technical and historical books written in harmony, note and sound records belonging to the works written with these techniques. | |||||
| References | Dubois, T. (1938). Armoni Kitabı (H. Öktem, C.R.Rey, Çev.): İstanbul. Burhaneddin Matbaası Thuille, L., Louis, R. (1933). Harmonielehre: Stuttgart, Verlag von Carl Grüninger Nachf | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Different approaches in the harmony ecoles |
| Week 2 | Different approaches in the harmony ecoles |
| Week 3 | Different approaches in the harmony ecoles |
| Week 4 | Different approaches in the harmony ecoles |
| Week 5 | Different books that are in the same approach and are written in the field of harmony |
| Week 6 | Different books that are in the same approach and are written in the field of harmony |
| Week 7 | Different books that are in the same approach and are written in the field of harmony |
| Week 8 | Mid-term Exam |
| Week 9 | Work analysists |
| Week 10 | Work analysists |
| Week 11 | Work analysists |
| Week 12 | Work analysists |
| Week 13 | Work analysists |
| Week 14 | Work analysists |
| Week 15 | Presentation |
| Week 16 | General Exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 20 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 20 |
| Final exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 40 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| Total Workload | 45 | 48 | 126 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. They have institutional and practical knowledge containing current information on composition and relevant areas | X | ||||
| 2. They have art and aesthetic knowledge to direct production. | X | ||||
| 3. They have knowledge on interdisciplinary interaction, research methods, music critic, art and science ethic in the field of composition | X | ||||
| 4. They produce the art works which entails creativity and advanced level skills themselves. | X | ||||
| 5. They establish the process and method of personal art and design. | X | ||||
| 6. They quote their opinions efficiently, joining the discussion on art and composition | X | ||||
| 7. They persuade other persons to initiate an art action and practice. | X | ||||
| 8. They orientate learning. | X | ||||
| 9. They pass the acquisition on their field to society. | X | ||||
| 10. They have the communication skill in a level to take an efficient role in national and international project team. | X | ||||
| 11. They follow up national and international field literature, using at least one foreign language as well as their mother tongues. | X | ||||
| 12. They use the computer software, information and communication technologies that composition requires. | X | ||||
| 13. They involve in public awareness process on the protection and recognition of cultural and artistic values. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest