GRA660 - CALLIGRAPHY RESEARCHES
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALLIGRAPHY RESEARCHES | GRA660 | Any Semester/Year | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Prequisites | - | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | ||||||
Instructor (s) | Assist. Prof. Banu Bulduk Türkmen | |||||
Course objective | While writing basically serves a functional purpose, it is also closely related to the stylistic developments of different branches of art. The importance of calligraphy in making writing an art object is an undeniable fact. The creation of artistic writing with aesthetic concerns is discussed within the scope of the aim of this course. Researching and experiencing the art of calligraphy, which is one of the basic formations of writing, and developing experimental production techniques, is the main problem of the course. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | The content of the course, the development process of the art of calligraphy from the beginning to the present, and the relationship between modern calligraphy and graphic design are evaluated within the scope of the project. Evaluation of calligraphy as an art beyond writing, its use with less communication task. In this situation, works with a high aesthetic image were applied, away from the attention of calligraphy to read text. An office writing skill and operability requirements calligraphy experience has an important place in many cultures. Calligraphy studies that show and transform variables according to cultures are among the problems covered in the course. Within the scope of the projects developed, technical examinations are made, it is ensured that they are handled in the most correct ways and in the right way, and they are carried out by considering the art of calligraphy. | |||||
References | 1. Jean, G. (2004). Yazı insanlığın belleği. Ankara: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. 2. Ambrosse, G. (2014). Grafik tasarımda tipografi. I?stanbul: Literatu?r Yayınları. 3. Bringhurst, R. (1997). The elements of typographic style. Canada: Hartley&Marks. 4. Faulmann, C. (2015). Yazı kitabı. I?stanbul: I?s? Bankası. 5. Gnanadesikan, A. (2009). The writing revolution; cuneiform to the internet. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. 6. Harris, D. (1995). The art of calligraphy. London: Toppan Printing. 7. Heller, S. (2006). Handwritten : expressive lettering in the digital age. New York: Thames & Hudson. 8. Hollis, R. (2001). Graphic design a concise history. London: Themes & Hudson. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | ||
Laboratory | ||
Application | ||
Field activities | ||
Specific practical training | ||
Assignments | ||
Presentation | ||
Project | ||
Seminar | ||
Midterms | ||
Final exam | ||
Total | ||
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | ||
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | ||
Total |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 0 | ||
Laboratory | 0 | ||
Application | 0 | ||
Specific practical training | 0 | ||
Field activities | 0 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 0 | ||
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | ||
Project | 0 | ||
Homework assignment | 0 | ||
Midterms (Study duration) | 0 | ||
Final Exam (Study duration) | 0 | ||
Total Workload | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest