MAB665 - BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC FINANCE
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC FINANCE | MAB665 | 2nd Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Prequisites | None | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
Instructor (s) | Department Staff | |||||
Course objective | The public sector aims to increase social welfare. The inadequacy of the arrangements prepared from the mainstream economic perspective in achieving the expected results led to the development of a different perspective. Within this framework, policymakers and scientists working in the field have started to use alternative tools. So behavioural public finances have come to the forefront. The constitution of public finance policies taking into account individual attitudes and behaviours will contribute to harmonization of objectives and results. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | Within the content of the lecture, primarily, the concept of bounded rationality will be discussed. For this purpose, cognitive heuristics and biases will be emphasized. Then behavioural public finance practices will be examined. Additionally, the relationship between the specified objectives and the outputs realized will be revealed. At the end of the semester, projects, which examine public finance within the framework of behavioural perspective will be carried by students. | |||||
References | Akdere, Ç. ve Büyükboyacı, M. (2015). Davranışsal İktisat ve Sınırlı Rasyonellik Varsayımı. D. Dumludağ, Ö. Gökdemir, L. Neyse, ve E. Ruben içinde, İktisatta Davranışsal Yaklaşımlar (s. 105-137). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları. Allingham, M. G. ve Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economic, 1 (3-4), 323-338. Alm, J. ve Bourdeaux, C. J. (2013). Applying Behavioral Economics to the Public Sector. Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, 91-134. Camerer, C. F. ve Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein ve M. Rabin içinde, Advances in Behavioral Economics (s. 2-51). New York: Princeton University Press. Congdon, W. J., Kling, J. R. ve Mullainathan, S. (2011). Policy and Choice Public Finance through the Lens of Behavioral Economics. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguins Books. Kahneman, D. ve Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-291. Nadaroğlu, H. (1992). Kamu Maliyesi Teorisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Introduction to the course: Extent, scope and key concepts |
Week 2 | Bounded rationality |
Week 3 | Prospect theory |
Week 4 | Heuristics |
Week 5 | Cognitive bias |
Week 6 | Methodology of behavioural economics |
Week 7 | Theoretical foundations of behavioural public finance |
Week 8 | Midterm |
Week 9 | Tax compliance |
Week 10 | Fiscal illusion |
Week 11 | Utility and political process |
Week 12 | Policy development from the perspective of behavioural economics |
Week 13 | Criticism of behavioural public finance |
Week 14 | Preparation for Final exam |
Week 15 | Final exam |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 1 | 10 |
Project | 1 | 10 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 20 |
Final exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 3 | 40 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 60 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 18 | 18 |
Project | 1 | 18 | 18 |
Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Total Workload | 32 | 102 | 180 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. The student deepens the knowledge acquired at the undergraduate level in its own field or in a different field, and explains the interaction between fields. | X | ||||
2. The student has knowledge and interpretation skills about economic and fiscal phases of societies and relations between societies. | X | ||||
3. The student has researching, planning and realization skills which are necessary for his/her field. | X | ||||
4. The student has the knowledge he/she must reach by processing data, at a theoretical level. | X | ||||
5. The student can solve a problem in his/her field as an individual and within a team, being aware of leadership responsibility. | X | ||||
6. The student can prepare reports and works in accordance with academic rules in the light of the knowledge he/she acquired in his/her field. | X | ||||
7. For problems he/she identified in his/her field, he/she makes suggestions of solution and/or solutions by using researh methods. | X | ||||
8. . The student can direct his/her education to a higher education program or a professÅŸon in his/her field. | X | ||||
9. The student is aware of the cotinuity of education and learning. He/she has a open attitude towards change and innovation. | X | ||||
10. The student can transfer fundamental knowledge he/she has in his/her field in a written and spoken manner to interested parties. | X | ||||
11. The student has the sufficient level of awareness of social rights, social justice, quality and cultural values environment protection, business health and security. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest