TÄ°D612 - TÄ°D INTERPRETING IN SPECIFIC FIELDS
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TÄ°D INTERPRETING IN SPECIFIC FIELDS | TÄ°D612 | 3rd Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| Prequisites | - | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Other: Study particular field of sign language interpreting, describe the variety of setting, explain the d | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Members of the department | |||||
| Course objective | ? The aim of this course is to teach the students the techniques of interpreting of general interest texts presenting different levels of language registers and covering various subjects, to explain the various translation difficulties and rendering the correct styles and register of the source text. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Specific field, terminology, techniques of sign language interpreting | |||||
| References | Gidere, M.(2011). Introduction a la Traductologie.Bruxelles: De Boeck Balard,M(2006). Qu?est-ce que la Traductologie.Lille: Artois Presses Université. Berk, Ö. (2005). Kuramlar Işığında Açıklamalı Çeviribilim Terimcesi. İstanbul: Multilingual Boztaş, İ. Ve H. Coşkun. (2002). Çevirmenin El Kitabı. Ankara: Hacettepe-TAŞ. Boztaş,İ., Z. Aksoy ve A. Kocaman. İngilizce Çeviri Kılavuzu. Ankara: Hacettepe-TAŞ. Duff, A. (1989). Translation. Oxford University Press. Eruz, S.(2003). Çeviriden Çeviribilime. İstanbul: Multilingual. Munday, Jeremy. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies. London: Routledge. Yazıcı, M. (2005). Çeviribilimin Temel Kavram ve Kuramları. İstanbul: Multilingual. Gürçağlar,Ş.,T.(2011). Çevirinin ABC?si.İstanbul: Say yayınları. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Specific field of interpreting |
| Week 2 | Synthezing the idea |
| Week 3 | Registre of language |
| Week 4 | Discourse of specific field |
| Week 5 | Differents level of language |
| Week 6 | Variety of setting |
| Week 7 | Education setting |
| Week 8 | Legal setting |
| Week 9 | Social setting |
| Week 10 | Medecine setting |
| Week 11 | Midterm |
| Week 12 | Media setting |
| Week 13 | Gouvernement setting |
| Week 14 | Practice |
| Week 15 | Practice |
| Week 16 | Final exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 38 | 5 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 20 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 25 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 15 | 5 | 75 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 45 | 45 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 48 | 48 |
| Total Workload | 32 | 131 | 240 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Will gain knowledge about the basic concepts of linguistics and linguistic features of sign languages. | X | ||||
| 2. Will survey the literature on interdisciplinary areas pertaining to sign linguistics and understand the interaction of sign linguistics with fields such as sociology, translation sciences and communication sciences. | |||||
| 3. Have knowledge about the historical development of sign languages and Turkish Sign Language. | |||||
| 4. Will evaluate phenomena such as language contact, language genesis, creole, bilingualism within the context of sign languages. | X | ||||
| 5. Develop research design on sign linguistics and make data analyses through efficient use of academic resources. | X | ||||
| 6. Pursue academic studies, plan related activities, monitor the Pursue academic studies, plan related activities, monitor the process, decide on and apply ways of accessing information. | |||||
| 7. Will carry out scientific research independently by using knowledge in linguistics, translation studies, communication sciences and related fields and present it. | |||||
| 8. Use their knowledge within the perspective of social responsibility and scientific ethic values. | X | ||||
| 9. Have general knowledge of the cultures of the languages they work on. | X | ||||
| 10. Master the languages they work with sufficiently in different communication situations. | X | ||||
| 11. Have fundamental knowledge of terminology and special field knowledge in order to make TID-Turkish/Turkish-TID translations. | X | ||||
| 12. Have professional knowledge of translation and translation studies. | X | ||||
| 13. Define stages of translation processes, translation strategies and problems encountered and develop methods for solving these problems. | X | ||||
| 14. Communicate effectively at basic level in TID. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest