THB658 - COMPARATIVE TURKIC FOLKLORE THEORIES and MET II
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMPARATIVE TURKIC FOLKLORE THEORIES and MET II | THB658 | Spring | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Prequisites | ||||||
Course language | English | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Question and Answer Field Trip | |||||
Instructor (s) | ||||||
Course objective | The aim of this course is to give the basic theorical and practical knowledge about the Context Oriented Folklore Theories and to teach how to use Context Oriented Folklore Theories in solving the problems related to oral, written and material culture. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | The scope, subjects and methods of the Context Oriented Folklore Thories The basic concepts of the Context Oriented Folklore Theories Application fields of Context Oriented Folklore Thories. Context- Oriented Folklore Theories and Turkic folklore research | |||||
References | Malinowski, B., (1992). Bilimsel Bir Kültür Teorisi, Çev. Saadet Özkal. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi. Malinowski, B., (1995). İnsan ve Kültür (Çev. F. Gümüş). Ankara: V Yayınları Lord, Albert B. (2000) The Singer Of Tales(ed. Stephen Mitchell and Gregory Nagy). Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press. Foley, J. M. (1988) The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Foley, J. M. (1990). Oral-Formulaic Theory; A Folklore Casebook. New York& London: Garland Publishing Inc. Çobanoğlu, Ö. (1998). Sözlü Kompozisyon Teorisi ve Günümüz Halkbilimi Çalışmalarındaki Yeri. Özkul Çobanoğlu, Metin Özarslan (ed.), Dursun Yıldırım Armağanı. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. Çobanoğlu, Ö. (1999). Halkbilimi Kuramları ve Araştırma Yöntemleri Tarihine Giriş. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Context -Oriented Folklore Theories and Turkic Folklore |
Week 2 | Context -Oriented Folklore Theories and Turkic Folklore |
Week 3 | The Functional Theory- Theorical base and development process |
Week 4 | Formation of the conceptual structure- Malinowski and his definition of culture |
Week 5 | Analysing methods of the Functional Theory on Folklore |
Week 6 | Mid- term exams |
Week 7 | The Theory of Oral composition: Emergence of the theory and Homer Problem |
Week 8 | Critiques to the Oral Composition Theory and changes in the theory |
Week 9 | Performance Theory: Theorical base and development process |
Week 10 | Folklore analysis methods according to Performance Theory |
Week 11 | Analysis methods of the Performance Theory on performances |
Week 12 | Applied Turkic Folklore Researches |
Week 13 | Applied Turkic Folklore Researches |
Week 14 | Applied Turkic Folklore Researches |
Week 15 | Applied Turkic Folklore Researches |
Week 16 | Final Exam |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 1 | 5 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 1 | 10 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 1 | 5 |
Presentation | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 20 |
Final exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 1 | 40 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 60 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 26 | 26 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Total Workload | 32 | 112 | 190 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Can apply the advanced cultural analysis skills which they acquired in their research; develops and deepens expert knowledge in different fields of Social Sciences and Fine Arts. | X | ||||
2. Can develop the advanced knowledge which they acquired eclectically with information obtained from different disciplines of Social Sciences and Fine Arts. | X | ||||
3. Deepen their knowledge about the Folklore studies carried out in the world. | X | ||||
4. By using their expert theorical and practical knowledge, students can create presentations, articles and thesis outputs on the solution of cultural and intercultural problems. | X | ||||
5. Can use their expert theorical and practical knowledge in solving cultural,economic,ethnic,historical and social problems in the fields of education,culture and arts. | X | ||||
6. Can use their expertise in the field of cultural science to raise the level of education, culture and art of the society;cultural preservation and survival,cultural economy, etc. uses in interactive areas. | X | ||||
7. Can collaborate in cultural studies by leading or working as a member of a team. | X | ||||
8. By Using level a foreign language in the level of European Language Portfolio B2,students can communicate orally or in writing. | X | ||||
9. Can use information and communication technologies which are required by social sciences, in an advanced level. | X | ||||
10. Students work for social awareness in cultural fields and can work as consultants in media literacy etc. related issues. | X | ||||
11. Can discuss universal culture policies in the light of scientific,social and cultural ethic values and they can also play an active role as being a consultant within the limits of universal rights. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest