THB757 - TRADITIONAL NARRATIVE and DICOURSE ANALYSIS
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRADITIONAL NARRATIVE and DICOURSE ANALYSIS | THB757 | Fall | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7.5 |
| Prequisites | ||||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Question and Answer Other | |||||
| Instructor (s) | ||||||
| Course objective | In this course, Narratives as the basic medium and expressive forms in which human beings speak, think, grow into selves and identities and understand others are examined. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | In this course, Narratives as the basic medium and expressive forms in which human beings speak, think, grow into selves and identities and understand others are examined. Beginning with a review of the place and importance of Narrative as a qualitative approach and methods used to analyze the individual and society in social sciences; specific approaches suitable for analysis of narratives that conceptualize the narratives as forms in which every kind of personal and collective experiences have been interpreted and reconstructed in the frame of situational and socio-cultural contexts. | |||||
| References | ? BAUMAN, Richard, Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. ? BROKMEIER, J & D. CARBAUGH, Narrative and Identity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. ? BRUNER, Jerome, Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990. ? CLANDININ, J. & F. M. CONNELLY, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Researches, John Wily and Sons Inc., 2000. ? ELLIS, Carolyn & M.G. FLAHERTY (Ed.), Investigating Subjectivity. Research on Lived Experience, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1992. ? LABOV, W & J. WALETZKY, ?Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience?, Essay on the Verbal and Visual Arts, Ed. June Helm, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1967: 12-44. ? LINDE, Charlotte, Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. ? MISHLER, E., Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1986. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Traditional Narrative and Discourse Analysis |
| Week 2 | The genre, context, form, expression charactaristics , vocabulary and idioms in traditional narratives |
| Week 3 | The contiunity, mobility, monotypness, repetition issues in expresions. |
| Week 4 | The formationa of oral text. |
| Week 5 | The transitivity and borrowing between oral narrative texts. |
| Week 6 | The character of expression and effects of its in oral text as a communication device. |
| Week 7 | Midterm exam |
| Week 8 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Myth and legends) |
| Week 9 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Folk Tales) |
| Week 10 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Folk Stories) |
| Week 11 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Turkish minstrel style poems) |
| Week 12 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Turkish idioms and proverbs) |
| Week 13 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Turkish idioms and proverbs) |
| Week 14 | The Discourse Analysis on Selected Narrative (Oral history and memory) |
| Week 15 | Overwiev |
| Week 16 | Final Exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 1 | 5 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 1 | 35 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 0 | 0 |
| Final exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 1 | 40 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 2 | 12 | 24 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 1 | 48 | 48 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 24 | 24 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Total Workload | 33 | 120 | 210 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Students produce new and original scientific thought related to folklore field | X | ||||
| 2. Students reach qualified and original results in the problems of method, concept and application which require expertise. | X | ||||
| 3. Students issue a scientific paper about their field and present new ideas and methods. | X | ||||
| 4. Students lead in solution of social problems which require cultural expertise. | X | ||||
| 5. Students take charge in national and international cultural projects as founder, coordinator or researcher | X | ||||
| 6. Students have high level information about cultural heritage management | X | ||||
| 7. Students study about applied cultural science in corporate level | X | ||||
| 8. Students shape the process of lifelong learning in liaison with media organs. | X | ||||
| 9. Students translate a scientific paper or book in a foreign language with terminology of field. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest