İÇT795 - PHILOSOPHY and SPACE I
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY and SPACE I | İÇT795 | 1st Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Prequisites | NA | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emre Demirel | |||||
| Course objective | Expect students to comprehend how the philosophical developments in 20th century influenced the understanding of space and how this changed architectural practice. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | It contains serial of lectures which considers the theoretical approaches of the 20th century philosophers on the definition of ideal space. | |||||
| References | P. Lynch, `All memory has to be re-imagined: the ?. Architectural Research Quarterly, 1 (2005), pp. 107-115 K. Harries, The Ethical Function of Architecture (Cambridge, the MIT Press, 2000). M. Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (London, Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1962). N. Coleman, `Words of Desire: Envisaging Architecture?. Interfaces, 1 (2004), pp. 183-199. Le Corbusier, Talks with Student (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1961), p.45. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Adolf Loos, Architecture |
| Week 2 | Adolf Loos, Architecture |
| Week 3 | Gaston Bachelard, Poetics of Space |
| Week 4 | Gaston Bachelard, Poetics of Space |
| Week 5 | Martin Heideger, Man Poetically Dwells |
| Week 6 | Martin Heideger, Man Poetically Dwells |
| Week 7 | Martin Heideger, Man Poetically Dwells |
| Week 8 | Martin Heideger, Man Poetically Dwells |
| Week 9 | Le Corbusier, Conversation with Students |
| Week 10 | Le Corbusier, Conversation with Students |
| Week 11 | Theodor Adorno, Culture Industry |
| Week 12 | Theodor Adorno, Culture Industry |
| Week 13 | Theodor Adorno, Culture Industry |
| Week 14 | Theodor Adorno, Prizms |
| Week 15 | Preparation to Final exam |
| Week 16 | Final Exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 14 | 20 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 1 | 20 |
| Presentation | 1 | 20 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 20 |
| Final exam | 1 | 20 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 18 | 80 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 2 | 20 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 14 | 5 | 70 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 14 | 5 | 70 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Total Workload | 73 | 35 | 300 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Knows main concepts, theories, principles, methods and ethics of design discipline. | X | ||||
| 2. Discusses and directs the current aspects of basic concepts/principles of design and art. | X | ||||
| 3. Uses design knowledge to produce new concepts and theories by making interdisciplinary studies. | X | ||||
| 4. Knows the nature and prospects of scientific research. | X | ||||
| 5. Develops original concepts, principles and theories about design process and methods. | X | ||||
| 6. Demonstrates an ability to analyze and criticize the current tendencies about contemporary design problems and develop and apply the solutions. | X | ||||
| 7. Develops scientific research methods through experimental and innovative processes in the field of design. | X | ||||
| 8. Utilizes design knowledge and methods for benefit of society. | X | ||||
| 9. Plans, establishes and manages academic discussions in the field of design. | X | ||||
| 10. Develops project proposals by making scientific and artistic assessments and transforms the proposals into original art and design works. | X | ||||
| 11. Comprehends the interdisciplinary character of design discipline and shares design knowledge by using at least one foreign language efficiently. | X | ||||
| 12. Produces and improves scientific and artistic knowledge in the field of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design to accomplish lifelong learning ideal. | X | ||||
| 13. Demonstrates an ability in teaching, analyzing and evaluating the design field at an academic level. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest