NFT716 - SCALE and QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT IN NEUROREHA
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCALE and QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT IN NEUROREHA | NFT716 | 3rd Semester | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
Prequisites | No | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Drill and Practice Case Study Problem Solving | |||||
Instructor (s) | Sibel Aksu Yıldırım PhD. Prof., Kadriye Armutlu PhD. Prof., Öznur Yılmaz PhD. Prof., Nezire Köse PhD. Prof., Sevil Bilgin PhD. Prof., Muhammed Kılınç PhD. Prof., İpek Gürbüz PhD. Assoc. Prof., Selen Serel Arslan PhD. Assoc. Prof., Numan Demir PhD. Assoc. Prof., Ayla Fil Balkan PhD. Assoc. Prof., Yeliz Salcı PhD. Assoc. Prof., Ender Ayvat PhD. Assist. Prof., Numan Bulut PhD. Assist. Prof., Fatma Ayvat PhD. Assist. Prof. | |||||
Course objective | To develop the specific scale and questionnaire for neurological diseases | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | Review of the literature related to neurological disease Examination of the scale and survey used in the evaluation of neurological diseases Creating the survey or scale to evaluate all aspects of specific disease or its some findings Researching the reliability and validity of the created scale or survey | |||||
References | 1-Edwards S. Neurological Physiotherapy. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1996. 2-Umphred DA. Neurological Rehabilitation. Mosby Company, London, 2001. 3-Hardcover B. Neurological Rehabilitation of Parkinson's Disease. HDunitz Martin Ltd, 2003. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Selecting the disease to create a scale or survey and literature search about it |
Week 2 | The general characteristics of the survey and scale used in neurological disorders |
Week 3 | To determine the scale or survey of the issue |
Week 4 | The process of developing a questionnaire |
Week 5 | Creation of the survey or scale materials and determination of the gold standart measurement methods to compare |
Week 6 | Midterm exam:To present the preliminary report summarizing the objectives and working methods of the scale or surveys |
Week 7 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 8 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 9 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 10 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 11 | Issuance of the primary results of the survey or scale |
Week 12 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 13 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 14 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 15 | Practical application: practice of the questionnaire or scale |
Week 16 | Final exam: Present the pilot study (an abstract or article)about the validity and reliability of the scale or survey |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 14 | 10 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 14 | 5 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 14 | 5 |
Presentation | 14 | 10 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 20 |
Final exam | 1 | 50 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 57 | 50 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 5 | 70 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 14 | 5 | 70 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 14 | 5 | 70 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 8 | 8 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Total Workload | 72 | 40 | 300 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Produces new information and educational material that give direction to clinical practice and academic studies in the field of Neurological Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation or apply the methods to a different field, plans, performs, conducts original research, analyses with appropriate statistical methods and reports. | X | ||||
2. Uses information and current technological tools related to clinical and academic practices. Directs the information rising from the scientific researches to practice, publishes the results in national or international peer-reviewed journals, makes presentations in scientific meetings. | X | ||||
3. Plans and performs the researches adhere to ethical standards, takes a role in national and international projects, publishes at least one article before completing the PhD thesis and presents in an international meeting, performs lifelong learning principles. | X | ||||
4. Uses the information that was produced in the field of Neurological Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation for the benefit of society, contribute to the policies that were produced in national and international level with other disciplines in the subject of protection and treatment from the neurological diseases. | X | ||||
5. Takes a part in updating, developing and performing the educational programs in the field of Neurological Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Works by having the consultancy information and ability. | X | ||||
6. Makes the planning, practice and distribution of tasks, interdisciplinary, in a leader and manager position in academic and scientific area; has the ability to solve conflicts. | X | ||||
7. Communicates written, orally and visually in peer in Professional areas by using at least one foreign language. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest