TAR758 - EUROPEAN REGIMES
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUROPEAN REGIMES | TAR758 | 2nd Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Prequisites | None | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Lecture and discussion | |||||
| Course objective | Dr. Gümeç Karamuk | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | This course will discuss the changing position of the central authority and the subjects due to the economic conditions until the French Revolution, the effects of Industrialization on this transformation, authoritarian and totalitarian regimes of the 20th century; interwar period in which communist and fascist state formations and governments, and the scene of the European regimes after World War II. | |||||
| References | Cassirer, E. (1984). Devlet Efsanesi, çev. N. Arat, İstanbul. Keane, J. (1994) Demokrasi ve Sivil Toplum, çev. N. Erdoğan, İstanbul. Sabine, G. (1969) Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi, c:I, çev. H. Rızatepe, Ankara Sabine, G. (1969) Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi, c:II, çev. A. Öktem, Ankara Sabine, G. (1991) Yakınçağ Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi, III: çev. Ö. Ozankaya, Ankara | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | The crown-authority in the Germanic states |
| Week 2 | The feudal suzerain |
| Week 3 | The ruler of the Renaissance |
| Week 4 | The absolutist monarch |
| Week 5 | The enlightened ruler |
| Week 6 | Midterm |
| Week 7 | From law-state to constitutional state |
| Week 8 | The power of Bourgeoisie state |
| Week 9 | The constitutional regime |
| Week 10 | The communist and fascist state |
| Week 11 | Midterm |
| Week 12 | The roots democracy |
| Week 13 | Democracy sovereignity |
| Week 14 | Anti-democratic sovereignity |
| Week 15 | The comparison between democratic and ant-democratic sovereignity |
| Week 16 | Final exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 15 |
| Project | 1 | 15 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 20 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 4 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 6 | 84 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 20 | 40 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 44 | 44 |
| Total Workload | 33 | 163 | 300 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Advances historical knowledge with research and creative thinking. | X | ||||
| 2. Reaches novel results in understanding the interactions between history and other social science disciplines in analyzing and evaluating new and complex ideas, arguments and developments using expert knowledge. | X | ||||
| 3. Describes and critically evaluates the essential historical sources, their language and properties and analyse the data contatined in them using various scientific methods and techniques including computer programs at the level of expertise; for this purpose develops new models, methods and applications. | X | ||||
| 4. Explains the reasons for the emergence of different schools of history and compares the historical knowledge produced by them in terms of method and content using a critical perspective. | X | ||||
| 5. Develops advanced historical projects and for that pupose forms and manages interdisciplinary teams of researchers. | X | ||||
| 6. Examines, using a critical perspective, and improves the norms and rules governing the relationships in the humanities in gerenal and in history in particular; and when necessary directs actions to replace them. | X | ||||
| 7. Supports the decision making processes of organizations working on preservation of the historical and cultural heritage and participates awareness-raising activities of these organizations. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest