ADB690 - GENERAL LINGUISTICS
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENERAL LINGUISTICS | ADB690 | Any Semester/Year | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
Prequisites | ||||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Question and Answer | |||||
Instructor (s) | Dr. Ayşe Zeynep Aydın, Dr. Aslı Gülsüm Budak | |||||
Course objective | Someone should has a minimum knowledge of linguistics, linguistic concepts and theories and approaches should be know to understand how the issues that related to forensic linguistics work in forensic area. This course will be established to meet this need and to have basis of forensic linguistics courses in the future. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | The the basic field and concepts of linguistics, large-scale and small-scale study areas of linguistic, different methods and approaches used in the field of linguistics, main linguists, the main linguistic theories, similarities and differences between these theories, the way that use of linguistics in forensic area. | |||||
References | 1. Allen, J. B. P. ve P. Corder. (Eds). 1973. Edinburgh 2. Courses in Applied Linguistics, cilt 1, Oxford: OUP. 3. Fromkin, Victoria, and Robert Rodman. 1980. 4. An Introduction to Language. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | The basic field and conceptsof linguistics |
Week 2 | The basic field and conceptsof linguistics |
Week 3 | Large-scale and small-scale study areas of linguistic |
Week 4 | Large-scale and small-scale study areas of linguistic |
Week 5 | Different methods and approaches used in the field of linguistics |
Week 6 | I. Midterm |
Week 7 | Different methods and approaches used in the field of linguistics |
Week 8 | Main linguists |
Week 9 | Main linguists |
Week 10 | The main linguistic theories |
Week 11 | The main linguistic theories |
Week 12 | Similarities and differences between these theories |
Week 13 | The way that use of linguistics in forensic area |
Week 14 | The way that use of linguistics in forensic area |
Week 15 | Preperation for final exam |
Week 16 | Final exam |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 1 | 50 |
Final exam | 1 | 50 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 11 | 154 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 16 | 16 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total Workload | 30 | 50 | 232 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Improves knowledge in proficiency level based on the undergraduate level in biology or different disciplines and analyses by using the statistic methods and interprets them. | X | ||||
2. Uses theoretical and practical knowledge obtained from his/her field in proficiency level | X | ||||
3. Interprets the knowledge that obtained from his/her field with integrating the acquired knowledge from the other disciplines and comprises new knowledge. | X | ||||
4. Sorts out the encountered problems on his/her field by using the investigation methods. | X | ||||
5. Conducts a study which requires specialization in his/her field independently | X | ||||
6. Improves new strategies to solve encountered and unpredictable complex problems in his/her field by taking responsibility | X | ||||
7. Evaluates the proficiency level knowledge and skills in his/her field in a critical approach and processes his/her learning. | X | ||||
8. Uses informatics and communication technologies with the computer software required in his/her field | X | ||||
9. Has the ability of minding social, scientific, cultural and ethical values in the levels of collecting, interpreting, applying and announcing the data in his/her field. | X | ||||
10. Evaluates the important people, events and cases by minding the results, which take in part in the improvement of his/her field. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest