GRA700-03 - RESEARCH PHD THESIS
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESEARCH PHD THESIS | GRA700-03 | 7th Semester | 5 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
Prequisites | Having completed the must PhD courses | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Must | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Discussion | |||||
Instructor (s) | Prof.Dr. İncilay Yurdakul, Prof. Namık Kemal Sarıkavak, Assist.Prof. Zülfikar Sayın, | |||||
Course objective | Studying of thesis | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | Selecting the thesis topic, Reviewing all the references with the selected topic, Preparing the research proposal, Developing a scale, Studying on the reliability and validity of the scale, Administering the scale and evaluating the findings, Reporting the research results. | |||||
References | All the references related to selected thesis topic in literature |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Studying on the reliability and validity of the scale |
Week 2 | Studying on the reliability and validity of the scale |
Week 3 | Studying on the reliability and validity of the scale |
Week 4 | Studying on the reliability and validity of the scale |
Week 5 | Administering the scale |
Week 6 | Administering the scale |
Week 7 | Administering the scale |
Week 8 | Administering the scale |
Week 9 | Administering the scale |
Week 10 | Administering the scale |
Week 11 | Administering the scale |
Week 12 | Administering the scale |
Week 13 | Administering the scale |
Week 14 | Administering the scale |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 14 | 50 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 14 | 10 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 |
Final exam | 1 | 40 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 28 | 60 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 40 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 5 | 70 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 14 | 20 | 280 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 20 | 280 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 14 | 17 | 238 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 32 | 32 |
Total Workload | 57 | 94 | 900 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Can take responsibility as a team member in collaboration with professional groups working in the field | X | ||||
2. Has foresight (vision) to lead designs that prompt from people or institutions | X | ||||
3. Has the knowledge of production an publication technologies | X | ||||
4. Has his/her unique understanding of graphic design style and contributes to the diversity of design by using the knowledge, methods and examples in the field of design in a unique way. | X | ||||
5. Develops projects and activities by following the national and international developments on graphic design, science and art | X | ||||
6. Competent in the field of visual communication design. They can express their views, participate in discussions and develop ideas at national and international meetings, symposiums and panels on visual communication. | X | ||||
7. Has special knowledge about the interaction between the disciplines related to the field of graphic design | X | ||||
8. Plans and manages the typical stages of his/her discipline. | X | ||||
9. Has expertise in one or more disciplines within the scope of graphic design | X | ||||
10. Can make graphic design, illustration, typography, photographic analysis and academically competent. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest