ARK628 - SEA PEOPLE
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA PEOPLE | ARK628 | 2nd Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Prequisites | None | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Other: presentation, group work, museum visit, individual study | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Assoc. Ayşegül Aykurt | |||||
| Course objective | The purpose of this course is to examine the factors which brought on the migration of Sea Peoples, to define the political geography and the social structure of Asia Minor before the time of the Sea Peoples, to discuss Sea Peoples in the light of the archeological and philological records, to provide information on Sea Peoples' social and cultural impact on the societies of Asia Minor. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | General chronology and bibliography Climate at the end of 2000 BC Political geography and the social structure of Asia Minor before the migration of the Sea Peoples Mention of Sea Peoples in archaeological and philological records Political geography and the social structure of Asia Minor after the migration of the Sea People | |||||
| References | Artzy, M. 1987. On boats and Sea Peoples. Bulletin of American Schools of Oriental Research 266: 75-84. Cohen, Y.- Singer, I. 2006. Late Synchronism between Ugarit and Emar. In: Amit Y, Zvi EB, Finkelstein I, Lipschits O, editors. Essays on Ancient Israel in its Near Eastern Context. A Tribute to Nadav Na'ama. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. pp. 123-139. Drews, R. 1993. The End of the Bronze Age. Changes in Warfare and the CatastropheCA. 1200 B.C. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Peczynski, Shell. 2009. The Sea People and Their Migration. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) RutgersUniversity. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | General chronology and bibliography |
| Week 2 | Political Geography of Asia Minor at the end of the Late Bronze Age |
| Week 3 | Society structure and the social life in Asia Minor at the end of the Late Bronze Age |
| Week 4 | Climate at the end of 2000 BC |
| Week 5 | Mid exam |
| Week 6 | Sea Peoples in the light of philological texts |
| Week 7 | Continuation of the previous week |
| Week 8 | Continuation of the previous week |
| Week 9 | Sea Peoples in the light of archaeological records |
| Week 10 | Continuation of the previous week |
| Week 11 | Mid exam |
| Week 12 | Society structure and the social life in Asia Minor after the migration of the Sea People |
| Week 13 | Continuation of the previous week |
| Week 14 | General evaluation and discussion |
| Week 15 | Preparation for final exam |
| Week 16 | Final exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 50 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 2 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 12 | 10 | 120 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 15 | 30 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Total Workload | 29 | 48 | 212 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Have the basic and updated knowledge of archaeology | X | ||||
| 2. Able to interpret and evaluate of undergraduate knowledge of archaeology and practice this knowledge in the field. | X | ||||
| 3. Able to record the archaeological data with technological implements | X | ||||
| 4. Able to transfer of the archaeological knowledge and experience through oral and written communication | X | ||||
| 5. Able to carry out archaeology projects | X | ||||
| 6. Able to take responsibility to solve the problems encountered in archaeological studies | X | ||||
| 7. Able to plan and manage archaeological activities | X | ||||
| 8. Able to identifying learning needs in archaeology and to take responsibility to protect cultural heritage. Also able to raise public awareness of cultural heritage | X | ||||
| 9. Able to transmit archaeological popular topics to the community | X | ||||
| 10. Able to take responsibility about data collecting, interpreting and publishing archaeological data | X | ||||
| 11. Able to work both in the field and in store/ laboratories | X | ||||
| 12. Able to present and protect the artefacts and cataloguing in the scope of documentation | X | ||||
| 13. Able to use at least one foreign language in Europeam Language Portfolio at General Level B2 to read up to date information about field and communicate with colleagues | X | ||||
| 14. Able to use information and communication technologies | X | ||||
| 15. Able to bring different disciplines together in archaeological studies | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest