ARK623 - EAST MEDITERRANEAN 2ND MILLENENNIUM BCTRANSFER-TRA
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAST MEDITERRANEAN 2ND MILLENENNIUM BCTRANSFER-TRA | ARK623 | 1st Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Prequisites | None | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Elective | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
Instructor (s) | Ass. Prof. Dr. Nazlı Karaaslan | |||||
Course objective | The aim of this course is to examine the trade between the states in East Mediterranean during the 2nd millennium BC in the light of archaeological and philological documents and interpret the effect of this trade to the cultures of East Mediterranean. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | Historical geography of East Mediterranean region in 2nd millennium BC. Intercultural relations and trade networks in East Mediterranean during the 2nd millennium BC. Sea trade and shipwrecks of 2nd millennium BC. Trade materials in East Mediterranean during the second millennium BC. The trade system in East Mediterranean in the light of archaeological and philological documents. | |||||
References | Aruz, J., K. Benzel ve J.M. Evans (eds.) (2008). Beyond Babylon. Art, Trade and Diplomacy in the Second Millennium BC. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Bachhuber, C. (2003). Aspects of Late Helladic Sea Trade. Clearly, M. ve M.J. (eds.), (1999). Cargoes from three Continents-Ancient Mediterranean Trade in Modern Archaeology. Boston. Gale, N.H. (ed.) (1991). Bronze Age Trade in Mediterranean. Jonsered. Heltzer, M. ve E. Lipinsky (eds.) (1988). Society and Economy in eastern Mediterranean. Yalçın, Ü., C. Pulak ve R. Slotta (2006). Uluburun Gemisi. 3000 Yıl Önce Dünya Ticareti. Bochum. |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Political geography of East Mediterranean in the 2nd millennium BC. |
Week 2 | Intercultural relations and trade journeys in East Mediterranean during the 2nd millennium BC. |
Week 3 | Ship journey and the development of trade routes in East Mediterranean in 2nd millennium BC. |
Week 4 | East Mediterranean sea trade in 2nd millennium BC in the light of philological documents |
Week 5 | Midterm exam |
Week 6 | The relations of Aegean region with Near East and Egypt during the Late Bronze Age: Interregional trade and Mycenaean. |
Week 7 | Aegean merchants: Interregional Trade and Linear B tablets; Foreign merchants in Aegean. |
Week 8 | Bronze Age shipwrecks in East Mediterranean. |
Week 9 | Uluburun shipwreck and Late Bronze Age sea trade |
Week 10 | Late Bronze Age glass trade |
Week 11 | Midterm exam |
Week 12 | Late Bronze Age metal trade |
Week 13 | Late Bronze Age amber trade |
Week 14 | General evaluation and seminar |
Week 15 | Preparation for final exam |
Week 16 | Final |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 2 | 50 |
Final exam | 1 | 50 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 2 | 50 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 12 | 7 | 84 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 19 | 38 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 20 | 20 |
Total Workload | 29 | 49 | 184 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Have the basic and updated knowledge of archaeology | X | ||||
2. Able to interpret and evaluate of undergraduate knowledge of archaeology and practice this knowledge in the field. | X | ||||
3. Able to record the archaeological data with technological implements | X | ||||
4. Able to transfer of the archaeological knowledge and experience through oral and written communication | X | ||||
5. Able to carry out archaeology projects | X | ||||
6. Able to take responsibility to solve the problems encountered in archaeological studies | X | ||||
7. Able to plan and manage archaeological activities | X | ||||
8. Able to identifying learning needs in archaeology and to take responsibility to protect cultural heritage. Also able to raise public awareness of cultural heritage | X | ||||
9. Able to transmit archaeological popular topics to the community | X | ||||
10. Able to take responsibility about data collecting, interpreting and publishing archaeological data | X | ||||
11. Able to work both in the field and in store/ laboratories | X | ||||
12. Able to present and protect the artefacts and cataloguing in the scope of documentation | X | ||||
13. Able to use at least one foreign language in Europeam Language Portfolio at General Level B2 to read up to date information about field and communicate with colleagues | X | ||||
14. Able to use information and communication technologies | X | ||||
15. Able to bring different disciplines together in archaeological studies | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest