SER636 - CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY II
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY II | SER636 | Spring | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Prequisites | None | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Preparing and/or Presenting Reports Demonstration Experiment Drill and Practice Project Design/Management | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Prof. Dr. Candan Terviel | |||||
| Course objective | To produce and display original artistic works, created from individually selected topics and designs, and completed after laboratory researches on various clay and glaze formul as in the light of the oretical information on ceramic technology. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | 1.Development of researchmethodsforproducingoriginalceramicworks. 2.Literature review on thetopicto be studied. 3.Concretization of experimentsandobservationsthroughpermanentworks. 4.Questioning of eachworkingprocessone-on-one, and in groupdiscussions 5.Documentation of completedworks, andpreparation of presentationsandreports. 6.Organization of laboratoryandstudioworks in a waysensitivetotheenvironment. 7.Team-work principle in firingtechniquesandapplications. 8.Documentation of thewholeprocess, anddiscussion. | |||||
| References | -Arcasoy,Ateş;Seramik Teknolojisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul 1991. -Bakla , Erdinç;?istanbul?un 100 Çini ve Seramik Sanatçısı?, İstanbul?un Yüzleri-19,İstanbul 2010. -?ChineseImagery?, Ceramic Art ShanghaiOrganizingCommittee,Fransa 2010. -Duitste ,Thimo;?Modern Ceramics in Nederland?, Hollanda,1990. -Ros , Dolors ,Murata,Yukiko;?Seramik?, İnkilap Yayınları, 2002. -Tanışan, Hüseyin,Mete,Zeliha;Seramik Teknolojisi ve Uygulaması, 1986. -Todd,Pamela;?TheArtsandCrafts Companion?,2004. -Vecchio, Mark Del;?PostmodernCeramics?Thamesand Hudson, 2001. -Waal,Edmund De ;?Modern Keramiek?, Atrium, 1999. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Selection of topics to be examined in relationtoceramictechnology |
| Week 2 | Making of a working plan for the selected topic, providingthenecessarytoolsandmaterials. Organizingthestudio. |
| Week 3 | Starting applications |
| Week 4 | Continuing with the applications in accordance with the researches |
| Week 5 | Continuing with research and applications |
| Week 6 | Discussion on applications regarding the researches, and drying of works |
| Week 7 | Midterm exam |
| Week 8 | Coloring of works and preparation for the appropriate firing technique |
| Week 9 | Firing |
| Week 10 | Completion of firing, preliminaryevaluation of completed Works |
| Week 11 | Making of variations, iftheresults of thecompletedworksaregood; if not, continuingwithcorrectioningwork |
| Week 12 | Applying post firingtechniques |
| Week 13 | Documentingcoloredandfiredworks |
| Week 14 | Preparation of worksfordisplay, andannouncements |
| Week 15 | - |
| Week 16 | Final exam (submission of reports) |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 1 | 5 |
| Application | 1 | 25 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 10 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 0 | 0 |
| Final exam | 1 | 10 |
| Total | 50 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Laboratory | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Application | 2 | 16 | 32 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 4 | 6 | 24 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 2 | 8 | 16 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 8 | 16 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Total Workload | 39 | 56 | 210 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest