NNT734 - THE SURFACE PROPERTIES of DENTAL IMPLANTS
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE SURFACE PROPERTIES of DENTAL IMPLANTS | NNT734 | Any Semester/Year | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Prequisites | ||||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Question and Answer Observation Preparing and/or Presenting Reports | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Department Academic Staff | |||||
| Course objective | Learning the methods of surface characterization of dental implants | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | ||||||
| References | 1) Fagan MJ. Implant prosthodontics. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, 1990. 2) Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. The Brenemark osseointegrated implant. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1989. 3) Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Mosby, Inc., 1999. Other related articles and books | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | The mechanical properties of dental implants |
| Week 2 | The topographycal properties of dental implants |
| Week 3 | The physicochemical properties of dental implants |
| Week 4 | Implant-bone interface |
| Week 5 | The preparation of dental implant surfaces (morphologic methods) |
| Week 6 | Midterm exam |
| Week 7 | The management of dental implant surfaces (physicochemical methods) |
| Week 8 | The types of dental implant surfaces |
| Week 9 | The types of dental implant surfaces |
| Week 10 | Endosseus implants |
| Week 11 | Midterm exam |
| Week 12 | Subperiosteal implants |
| Week 13 | Corosive response of implant-bone interface tissues |
| Week 14 | The properties of titanium |
| Week 15 | Final Exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 14 | 5 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 15 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 30 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 5 | 70 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 28 | 28 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 30 | 60 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 70 | 70 |
| Total Workload | 32 | 136 | 270 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Being able to use mathematics, science, and engineering information to develop new methods in the fields of nanotechnology and nanomedicine. | X | ||||
| 2. Being able to search information in Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine fields and to reach, to evaluate and to comment on this information | X | ||||
| 3. Being able to make supplements to the literature and to develop a skill for presenting their studies fluently in written and oral forms in national and international media. | X | ||||
| 4. To have a Professional ethics and social responsibility. | X | ||||
| 5. By adopting the importance of lifetime learning in principle, actively following the developments in novel technological applications with databases and other sources. | X | ||||
| 6. Being able to choose and to use techniques, devices and software with the suitable information and communication Technologies in order to solve engineering problems. | X | ||||
| 7. To communicate in oral and written forms in a foreign language at least in the C1 grade level of European Language Portfolio in the fields of nanotechnology and nanomedicine. | X | ||||
| 8. Being able to design experiments, to do experimentation, to analyze and evaluate experimental results and to prepare a report to present. | X | ||||
| 9. Being able to do within discipline and interdisciplinary teamwork | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest