ERG667 - QUALITY of LIFE IN REHABILITATION
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUALITY of LIFE IN REHABILITATION | ERG667 | 1st Semester | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Prequisites | ||||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Field Trip Team/Group Work Drill and Practice | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Mine Uyanık PhD Prof., Gonca Bumin PhD Prof., Esra Akı PhD Prof.,Gamze Ekici Çağlar PhD Prof., Çiğdem Öksüz PhD Prof., Meral Huri PhD. Assoc. Prof., , Sedef Şahin, PhD. Assoc. Prof., Gökçen Akyürek PhD. Assoc. Prof., Onur Altuntaş, PhD , Assoc. Prof., Hatice Abaoğlu PhD , Assoc. Prof.,, Orkun Tahir Aran PhD , Assoc. Prof. | |||||
| Course objective | Course objective; To research the quality of life questionnaires used in Rehabilitation for individuals with different ages and disabilities, to achieve these questionnaires, and to analyze and interpret with the appropriate statistical method, for identifying strategies to improve the quality of life. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Definition of quality of life The use of measures of quality of life Quality of life questionnaires used in rehabilitation The use of literature Reach scales, the use of scales, interpretation, and analysis of scales Strategies to improve the quality of life | |||||
| References | 1.Renwick, R., Brown, I., Nagler, M. Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications.Sage Publications, London,1996. 2.Romney,D.M.Improving the quality of life:recommendations people with and without disabilities.Kluwer, Netherlands, 1994. 3.Carr, A., Higginson, I., Robinson,P. Quality of Life. BMJ, London, 2003. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Definition of quality of life |
| Week 2 | Quality-of-life measures |
| Week 3 | Health-related quality of life |
| Week 4 | Health-related quality of life |
| Week 5 | The concept of life satisfaction |
| Week 6 | Health-related quality of life assessment methods |
| Week 7 | Health-related quality of life assessment methods |
| Week 8 | Health-related quality of life assessment practice |
| Week 9 | Health-related quality of life assessment practice |
| Week 10 | Analysis of practice results |
| Week 11 | Analysis of practice results |
| Week 12 | Interpretation of application results |
| Week 13 | Interpretation of application results |
| Week 14 | Improving health-related quality of life |
| Week 15 | Presenting homework |
| Week 16 | Presenting homework |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 14 | 10 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 14 | 20 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 14 | 50 |
| Presentation | 14 | 20 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 0 | 0 |
| Final exam | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 15 | 4 | 60 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 15 | 2 | 30 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 15 | 4 | 60 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 5 | 3 | 15 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 3 | 15 | 45 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Workload | 53 | 28 | 210 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Acquires advanced evidence-based knowledge in occupational therapy, enhancing health and life quality holistically. | X | ||||
| 2. Understands occupational therapy's approaches, thinks independently in health and rehabilitation, identifies research needs, and develops projects with various methods. | X | ||||
| 3. Comprehends occupational therapy's dynamic nature, becoming skilled as an educator, manager, and researcher using technology and languages. | |||||
| 4. Adheres to occupational therapy's ethical standards and professional independence. | X | ||||
| 5. Engages in interdisciplinary work, supervises students in clinical settings, and manages roles within occupational therapy. | X | ||||
| 6. Develops services to meet community needs while adhering to lifelong learning and teaching principles. | X | ||||
| 7. Critically evaluates knowledge on rehabilitation models, enhances collaboration across disciplines, and promotes the profession. | X | ||||
| 8. Develops policies supporting societal participation of marginalized groups like street children, immigrants, and the homeless. | X | ||||
| 9. Analyzes the impact of social, cultural, and economic factors on societal participation and organizes health-improving educational activities. | X | ||||
| 10. Gains deep knowledge of occupational therapy's dimensions, critically assesses field information, and proposes creative solutions. | |||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest