Ä°LT727 - SOCIAL SEMIOTICS

Course Name Code Semester Theory
(hours/week)
Application
(hours/week)
Credit ECTS
SOCIAL SEMIOTICS Ä°LT727 3rd Semester 3 0 3 10
Prequisites
Course languageTurkish
Course typeElective 
Mode of DeliveryFace-to-Face 
Learning and teaching strategiesLecture
Discussion
Preparing and/or Presenting Reports
 
Instructor (s)Assist. Prof. Dr. Burcu ÅžimÅŸek  
Course objectiveThe aim of the course is to provide the basic semiotic theories and practices useful for critical thinking and to develop an understanding of semiotics and its application to the analysis of communication and meaning as well as an insight in studying the social dimensions of meaning, and of the power of human processes of signification and interpretation (known as semiosis) in shaping individuals and societies. 
Learning outcomes
  1. At the end of this course, students are expected to: - to gain a practical understanding of semiotics
  2. - improve critical thinking skills
  3. - understand the major debates in the application of semiotics, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. .
  4. - learn to use semiotics to analyze communication, meaning, and culture.
  5. - Undertake substantial research and semiotic analysis of an object of their choosing
Course ContentSocial semiotics is a branch of the field of semiotics which investigates human signifying practices in specific social and cultural circumstances, and which tries to explain meaning-making as a social practice. Based on the work of structuralist semiotics (Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure and the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce) the course investigates the analytical and theoretical frameworks which can explain meaning-making in a social context in order to understand the signs and sign systems underlying many aspects of human culture, therefore focuses on the work of semioticians in the areas of myth, photography, film, television, and sub?culture, and consider how semiotic concepts and methods can be used to analyze a variety of cultural products, from fashion to television news to literature. 
ReferencesHalliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Maryland. University Park Press.
Hodge, R. and G. Kress. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity
Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold: London.
Randviir, A. (2004). Mapping the World: Towards a Sociosemiotic Approach to Culture. (Dissertationes Semioticae Universitatis Tartuensis 6.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Thibault, P.J. (1991). Social semiotics as praxis: Text, social meaning making, and Nabokov's Ada. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics, London: Routledge
 

Course outline weekly

WeeksTopics
Week 1Course Introduction
Week 2Structural vs. Social Semiotics
Week 3Social Semiotics
Week 4The Founding Fathers Revisited
Week 5Context as Meaning: the semiotic dimension
Week 6Style as ideology
Week 7Semiotic principles
Week 8Dimensions of semiotic analysis
Week 9Multimodal cohesion
Week 10Applying Semiotic Analysis
Week 11Group Presentations
Week 12Group Presentations
Week 13Group Presentations
Week 14Group Presentations
Week 15Preparation for the Final Exam
Week 16Final Exam

Assesment methods

Course activitiesNumberPercentage
Attendance1420
Laboratory00
Application00
Field activities00
Specific practical training00
Assignments160
Presentation420
Project00
Seminar00
Midterms00
Final exam00
Total100
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes040
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes060
Total100

WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION

Activities Number Duration (hour) Total Work Load
Course Duration (x14) 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application000
Specific practical training000
Field activities000
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect)16348
Presentation / Seminar Preparation435140
Project000
Homework assignment17070
Midterms (Study duration)000
Final Exam (Study duration) 000
Total Workload35111300

Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes

D.9. Key Learning OutcomesContrubition level*
12345
1. Commands knowledge about current and advanced approaches and concepts in communication sciences and has the ability to apply them in a research.  X  
2. Understands the interaction between communication sciences and other humanities fields, follows and evaluates debates.    X
3. Contributes to scientific studies by carrying out original studies, programs or projects independently.   X 
4. Converts the new knowledge produced by conducting original studies or bringing new interpretations to existing studies into national and international publications.  X  
5. Develops new ideas, models and methods related to the field, supports the decision-making processes of people and organizations related to the studies on the solution of problems in the field.    X
6. Recognizes national and international knowledge sources in the field and explains them to the people under his/her responsibility through theoretical and applied studies.  X  
7. Uses computer software, information and communication technologies required by the field at an advanced level.  X  
8. Creates projects and takes part in national and international projects.   X 
9. Analyzes and evaluates new and complex ideas and discussions created by the interaction of the field with other disciplines.    X
10. Conducts leadership in environments that require solving original and interdisciplinary problems related to the field.    X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest