TAR745 - CHANGES IN OTTOMAN BUREAUCRACY IN THE 19TH CENTURY
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHANGES IN OTTOMAN BUREAUCRACY IN THE 19TH CENTURY | TAR745 | 1st Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Prequisites | - | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Preparing and/or Presenting Reports | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Dr. Mehmet V. Seyitdanlıoğlu | |||||
| Course objective | To teach changes taking place in the central and provincial administration and bureaucracy in the 19th Century. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | The characteristics of the central and provincial bureaucracy in the classical period, with an emphasis on the Sultanate and the Divan-i Humayun and Grand Vezir; Ottoman class of civil servants: similarity, difference and interactions with their European counterparts; political and administrative reasons for the deterioration of the Ottoman institutions;The birth of the modern bureaucracy and its interaction with the European institutions during reign of Mahmud II; Stages and the results of changes in the new institutions. | |||||
| References | Uzunçarşılı İ. H. (1984) Osmanlı Devletinin Merkez ve Bahriye Teşkilatı, Ankara, TTK Yayını. Ortaylı, İ. (1992) İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı, Ankara, Hil Yayını. Ortaylı, İ. (2007) Türkiye İdare ve Teşkilat Tarihi, Ankara, Cedid Neşriyat. Findley, C. (1980) Bureaucratic Reform in the Ottoman Empire, Princeton, Princeton Uni. Press. Akyıldız, A. (2000) Osmanlı Merkez Teşkilatında Reform, İstanbul, Eren Yayınları. Akyıldız, A. (2004) Osmanlı Bürokrasisi ve Modernleşme, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları. Seyitdanlıoğlu, M. (1996) Tanzimat Devrinde Meclis-i Vâlâ 1838-1868, Ankara, TTK Yayını. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 30 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 20 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 3 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 6 | 84 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 2 | 20 | 40 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 44 | 44 |
| Total Workload | 33 | 163 | 300 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Advances historical knowledge with research and creative thinking. | X | ||||
| 2. Reaches novel results in understanding the interactions between history and other social science disciplines in analyzing and evaluating new and complex ideas, arguments and developments using expert knowledge. | X | ||||
| 3. Describes and critically evaluates the essential historical sources, their language and properties and analyse the data contatined in them using various scientific methods and techniques including computer programs at the level of expertise; for this purpose develops new models, methods and applications. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest