OLC611 - MEASUREMENT and EVALUATION APPLICATIONS IN SCHOOLS
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEASUREMENT and EVALUATION APPLICATIONS IN SCHOOLS | OLC611 | Any Semester/Year | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Prequisites | OLC606 | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Discussion Other: research, presentation, application | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Assoc. Prof. Duygu ANIL | |||||
| Course objective | To identify the similarities and the differences among traditional and complemental measurement and evaluation approaches, to be able to develop traditional and complemental measurement instruments to measure learning objectives. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Kutlu, Ö., DOĞAN, C. D. & Karakaya, İ. (2009). Öğrenci Başarısının Belirlenmesi. Pegema yayınları: Ankara. Berberoğlu, G. (2006). Sınıf İçi Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Teknikleri. Morpa yayınları: İstanbul. Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational assesment of students. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Popham, W. J. (2000). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. ASCD. Virginia, USA. Popham, J. W. (2000). Modern education measurement. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Airasian, W. P. (1991). Classroom assessment. McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York. | |||||
| References | ||||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Basic concepts in measurement and evaluation |
| Week 2 | Traditional measurement and evaluation instruments |
| Week 3 | Essays, oral examinations |
| Week 4 | Short-answer tests |
| Week 5 | Multiple-choice tests |
| Week 6 | Midterm exam |
| Week 7 | Complemental measurement and evaluation instruments |
| Week 8 | Performance assessment |
| Week 9 | Types of scoring keys used in performance assessment |
| Week 10 | Portfolio and its types |
| Week 11 | Portfolio preparaion process |
| Week 12 | Self-peer-group evaluation |
| Week 13 | Problems in traditional and complemental measurement and evaluation instruments at schools and suggested solutions |
| Week 14 | Development and application of a complemental measurement instrument |
| Week 15 | Final exam |
| Week 16 | Project submission |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 10 | 5 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 2 | 5 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 10 |
| Project | 1 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 30 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 5 | 18 | 90 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Project | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Total Workload | 23 | 91 | 202 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. To have the fundamental knowledge of concepts related to measurement and evaluation, statistics and research methods. | X | ||||
| 2. To be able to explain distinguishing features and characteristics of fundamental theories of measurement and evaluation. | X | ||||
| 3. To be able to explain the research methods and statistical methods that will be used with these methods. | X | ||||
| 4. To be able to interpret the results of the national and international exams by relating them to the concepts of measurement and evaluation. | X | ||||
| 5. To be able to develop or adapt measurement instruments, which are aligned with the objectives, by employing measurement techniques. | X | ||||
| 6. To be able to identify a research problem related to measurement and evaluation, plan and administer scientific research methods for the solution of the research problem. | X | ||||
| 7. To be able to interpret and critique the recent developments related to measurement and evaluation. | X | ||||
| 8. To be able to monitor new software related to measurement and evaluation and use appropriate software for research problems. | X | ||||
| 9. To comply with the ethical rules in the research studies related to measurement and evaluation | X | ||||
| 10. To be able to share effectively the knowledge and skills related to measurement and evaluation with the co-workers. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest