MDN645 - EVALUATION of MINING PROJECTS

Course Name Code Semester Theory
(hours/week)
Application
(hours/week)
Credit ECTS
EVALUATION of MINING PROJECTS MDN645 Any Semester/Year 3 0 3 7
Prequisites
Course languageTurkish
Course typeElective 
Mode of DeliveryFace-to-Face 
Learning and teaching strategiesLecture
Discussion
Question and Answer
Case Study
 
Instructor (s)Prof. Dr. A. Erhan TERCAN 
Course objectiveAn ability to evaluate the mining projects 
Learning outcomes
  1. Income based evaluation Discounted cash flow analysis and evaluating project with different life times Application of the Monte-Carlo simulation method
Course ContentConcept of value. Income based evaluation. Comparing the projects which have different life times and selecting the best option. Net present value analysis. Risk analysis in mining projects. Project analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation. Dynamic real options.  
ReferencesAustralian Mineral Economics Monograph 24 ? A Survey of Important Issues (2006), Philip Maxwell and Pietro Guj (Ed.), published by The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Torries, T.F., 1998, Evaluating Mineral Projects: applications and misconceptions, Sociate of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
Noabes, M. and T. Lanz (Eds.) 1993, Cost Estimation Handbook for the Australian Mining Industry, Monograph #20, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..
 

Course outline weekly

WeeksTopics
Week 1Introduction to mining project evaluation and concept of value
Week 2Income based evaluation
Week 3Discounted cash flow
Week 4Comparison of the projects having different life times
Week 5Net present value analysis / Risk analysis
Week 6Stochastic financial models and Monte Carlo simulation
Week 7Bayesian decision tree and progressive risk and value analysis
Week 8Dynamic real options
Week 9Evaluation of the assignments
Week 10Case study
Week 11Case study
Week 12Case study
Week 13Case study
Week 14Case study
Week 15Student presentations
Week 16Final Exam

Assesment methods

Course activitiesNumberPercentage
Attendance00
Laboratory00
Application00
Field activities00
Specific practical training00
Assignments125
Presentation125
Project150
Seminar00
Midterms00
Final exam00
Total100
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes050
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes050
Total100

WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION

Activities Number Duration (hour) Total Work Load
Course Duration (x14) 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application000
Specific practical training000
Field activities000
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect)13565
Presentation / Seminar Preparation12020
Project16565
Homework assignment12020
Midterms (Study duration)000
Final Exam (Study duration) 000
Total Workload30113212

Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes

D.9. Key Learning OutcomesContrubition level*
12345
1. An ability to develop and use knowledge gained in undergraduate level for mining engineering in an advanced level.    X
2. An ability to have knowledge about up to date techniques and new developments in the field of mining engineering and learn them if necessary.   X 
3. An ability to complete and apply knowledge from limited and incomplete data by using scientific methods.    X
4. An ability to determine causes of the problems and their solution methods aroused in the applications of mining engineering by using research techniques.    X
5. An ability to use advanced knowledge and skills gained in the field of mining engineering in the interdisciplinary works, to integrate them with knowledge from other disciplines, to interpret and to construct new knowledge.    X
6. An ability to work in multidisciplinary teams, and to develop the solutions for complex and unpredicted problems.   X 
7. An ability to evaluate expert knowledge and skills with a critical approach.    X
8. An ability to assess critically advanced level knowledge and skill gained in the field of mining engineering.   X 
9. Presenting studies to different groups in writing or orally, supporting them with qualitative and quantitative data.     X
10. Uses computer software and information-communication technologies required by the field.    X
11. Can audit all kinds of work in the field by taking into account social, scientific, environmental, cultural and ethical values.    X 

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest