TAE730 - COMPARATIVE TURKISH ART II
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMPARATIVE TURKISH ART II | TAE730 | 2nd Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Prequisites | None | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Question and Answer Other | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Professor Nermin ÅžAMAN DOÄžAN | |||||
| Course objective | This course aims to introduce the students to artistic applications from the early Turkish art to today; the comparison of them with western art. Through the prism of modern art theories the course will concentrate on Central Asia, Seljuk and Ottoman architecture and other plastic arts; the comparison of artifacts of sculpture, paintings, architecture in the 20th century Turkey and Turkish republics; the influence of Turkish culture to modern Turkish art theories. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | -The artistic applications from the early Turkish art to today and their comparison to modern art -The prism of modern art, Central Asia, Seljuk and Ottoman architecture and other plastic arts. -The comparison of artifacts of sculpture, paintings, architecture in the 20th century Turkey and Turkish republics -The influence of Turkish culture to modern Turkish art | |||||
| References | Erdmann, K. (1961). Das Anatolische Karavansaray des 13. Jahrhunderts, Cilt 1, Berlin.; Erdmann, K. (1976). Das Anatolische Karavansaray des 13. Jahrhunderts, Cilt 1, Berlin.; Ögel, S. (1986). Anadolu Selçuklu Sanatı Üzerine Görüşler, İstanbul: Güven Matbaası.; Schneider, G. (1980). Geometrische Bauornamente Der Seldschuken in Kleinasien, Wiesbaden: Reichert.; Schneider, G. (1989). Pflanzlıche Bauornamente Der Seldschuken in Kleinasien, Wiesbaden: Reichert.; Sözen, M. (1971). Anadolu Kentleri. İstanbul: Doku Yayınevi. Kızıltan, A. (1958). Anadolu Beyliklerinde Cami ve Mescitler, İstanbul.; Öney, G. (1989). Beylikler Devri Sanatı XIV-XV. Yüzyıl (1300-1453), Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.; Anadolu Selçukluları ve Beylikler Dönemi Uygarlığı I-II, Ocak, A. Y. (ed., I. cilt), Peker, A. U. - Bilici, K. (ed., II. cilt), Ankara: 2006, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | The art relations of the Dulkadir and the Ramazanoglu emirates |
| Week 2 | The architercture of the Candaroglu emirate |
| Week 3 | The architectural structures of the emirates of Aydin, Mentese and Saruhan I |
| Week 4 | The architectural structures of the emirates of Aydin, Mentese and Saruhan II |
| Week 5 | The architectural structures of the emirate of Osman |
| Week 6 | The political, social and cultural environment of the Medieval Turkish period in Anatolia I |
| Week 7 | The political, social and cultural environment of the Medieval Turkish period in Anatolia II |
| Week 8 | The art relations between the Seljuk and early Emirates period |
| Week 9 | The art of Artuklu: examples of kulliyes and open court medreses |
| Week 10 | The Mengucek and Seljuk art relations: structural examples in Erzincan and Divrik |
| Week 11 | Structural analysis of Turkish art in Central Asia I |
| Week 12 | Structural analysis of Turkish art in Central Asia II |
| Week 13 | Modern Turkish art |
| Week 14 | Modern Central Asia architecture |
| Week 15 | Comparison of Central Asian Art and Anatolian art |
| Week 16 | Final Exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 14 | 10 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 1 | 30 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 0 |
| Final exam | 1 | 40 |
| Total | 80 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 16 | 60 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 40 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 6 | 5 | 30 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 6 | 84 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 2 | 10 | 20 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 5 | 6 | 30 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 40 | 40 |
| Total Workload | 49 | 104 | 300 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Comprehend the social, economic, cultural, geographical changes of the Turkish world in a holistic perspective. | X | ||||
| 2. Comprehend a source language related to the Turkish culture and other cultures interacted with. | X | ||||
| 3. Produce interdisciplinary, analytical knowledge on the areas related to the Turkish culture. | X | ||||
| 4. Analyze the language and social structure phases of Turkish culture, taking into account the contact processes with neighboring cultures. | X | ||||
| 5. Develop an effective methodology enabling the production of knowledge on Turkish language, culture and social structure. | X | ||||
| 6. Produce new perspectives influenced from the interdisciplinary nature of Turkish Studies and commend on possible political, military and socio-economic matters. | X | ||||
| 7. As an expert on regional assimilation problems, analyze the possible consequences of it and to produce policy suggestions on the matter to relevant private and state departments. | X | ||||
| 8. Generate analysis on global ethnic and cultural problems in the view of Turkish Studies. | X | ||||
| 9. Develop new insights on history, philology, social, economic fields related to Turkish Culture and interacted with. | X | ||||
| 10. Expand norms and methods of knowledge production from the perspective of Turkish Studies. | X | ||||
| 11. Advance new technological methods, in the study of language, history and culture of Turkish Culture geography. | X | ||||
| 12. Make scientific contributions to the Turkish language, history, culture and interactive cultures. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest