KOM722 - METHOD ANALYSIS II

Course Name Code Semester Theory
(hours/week)
Application
(hours/week)
Credit ECTS
METHOD ANALYSIS II KOM722 2nd Semester 2 2 3 15
PrequisitesKOM721
Course languageTurkish
Course typeMust 
Mode of DeliveryFace-to-Face 
Learning and teaching strategiesLecture
Discussion
Drill and Practice
 
Instructor (s)Prof. Levent Kuterdem 
Course objectiveMake an advanced analysis of education methods written in the fields of solfege, dictation, decipher and music theory and write a method in these fields. 
Learning outcomes
  1. 1. They make an advanced analysis of education methods written in the field of solfege.
  2. 2. They make an advanced analysis of education methods written in the field of dictation.
  3. 3. They make an advanced analysis of education methods written in the field of decipher.
  4. 4. They make an advanced analysis of education methods written in the field of music theory.
  5. 5. They write an education method in the field of solfege.
  6. 6. They write an education method in the field of dictation.
  7. 7. They write an education method in the field of decipher.
  8. 8. They write an education method in the field of music theory.
Course ContentMethods written in the subjects of solfege, decipher, dictation and theory, sound records 
ReferencesGallon, N. (1924). Cent Dictees Musicales Progressives A Deux Parties: Paris.
Editions Jean Jobert
Gallon, N. (1942). Cent Dictees Musicales Progressives A Trios Parties: Paris.
Editions Jean Jobert
Gallon, N. (1949). Cours Complet Dictee Musicale: Paris. Editions Jean Jobert
Lavignac, A. (1940). Volume 1-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1980). Volume 2-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1990). Volume 2-C: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1954). Volume 3-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1965). Volume 4-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1947). Volume 5-B: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Lavignac, A. (1980). Volume 5-C: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine
Saygun, A. (1967). Töresel Musiki: İstanbul. Milli Eğitim Basımevi
Baran, İ. (1995). Temel Müzik Kuralları. Ankara: Evrensel Müzikevi 

Course outline weekly

WeeksTopics
Week 1Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 2Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 3Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 4Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 5Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 6Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 7Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 8Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation.
Week 9Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 10Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 11Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 12Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 13Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 14Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory
Week 15Presentation
Week 16General Exam

Assesment methods

Course activitiesNumberPercentage
Attendance00
Laboratory00
Application00
Field activities00
Specific practical training00
Assignments00
Presentation140
Project00
Seminar00
Midterms00
Final exam160
Total100
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes040
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes060
Total100

WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION

Activities Number Duration (hour) Total Work Load
Course Duration (x14) 14 4 56
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application148112
Specific practical training000
Field activities000
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect)148112
Presentation / Seminar Preparation13030
Project000
Homework assignment000
Midterms (Study duration)000
Final Exam (Study duration) 11515
Total Workload4465325

Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes

D.9. Key Learning OutcomesContrubition level*
12345
1. They have upper level institutional and practical knowledge containing current information on composition and relevant areas    X 
2. They comprehend art and composition in a level to discuss and redirect them in social, cultural, political and economic frame.    X
3. They grasp interdisciplinary interaction to the extent to reach new concepts and synthesises.    X
4. They develop and document innovative research methods on artistic production through experimental and creative processes.     X
5. They produce or interpret the original work in the quantity to be accepted by art and science evaluation boards.    X
6. They have the ability to share their original Works related to their fields with society and evaluate results.    X
7. They plan and execute group projects.    X
8. They develop new thoughts and methods bringing solution to their fields    X
9. They have qualification to contact with society by means of their original Works.    X
10. They initiate and direct academic discussions, transferring their thoughts to the experts of their fields efficiently.    X
11. They communicate via at least one foreign language verbally and in writing.   X 
12. They contribute in public awareness process on the protection and recognition of cultural and artistic values     X
13. They make contribution to the activities raising awareness on directing contribution of art on society.    X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest