KOM722 - METHOD ANALYSIS II
Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METHOD ANALYSIS II | KOM722 | 2nd Semester | 2 | 2 | 3 | 15 |
Prequisites | KOM721 | |||||
Course language | Turkish | |||||
Course type | Must | |||||
Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion Drill and Practice | |||||
Instructor (s) | Prof. Levent Kuterdem | |||||
Course objective | Make an advanced analysis of education methods written in the fields of solfege, dictation, decipher and music theory and write a method in these fields. | |||||
Learning outcomes |
| |||||
Course Content | Methods written in the subjects of solfege, decipher, dictation and theory, sound records | |||||
References | Gallon, N. (1924). Cent Dictees Musicales Progressives A Deux Parties: Paris. Editions Jean Jobert Gallon, N. (1942). Cent Dictees Musicales Progressives A Trios Parties: Paris. Editions Jean Jobert Gallon, N. (1949). Cours Complet Dictee Musicale: Paris. Editions Jean Jobert Lavignac, A. (1940). Volume 1-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1980). Volume 2-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1990). Volume 2-C: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1954). Volume 3-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1965). Volume 4-A: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1947). Volume 5-B: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Lavignac, A. (1980). Volume 5-C: Paris. Editions Henry Lemoine Saygun, A. (1967). Töresel Musiki: İstanbul. Milli Eğitim Basımevi Baran, İ. (1995). Temel Müzik Kuralları. Ankara: Evrensel Müzikevi |
Course outline weekly
Weeks | Topics |
---|---|
Week 1 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 2 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 3 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 4 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 5 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 6 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 7 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 8 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of solfege, decipher, dictation. |
Week 9 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 10 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 11 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 12 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 13 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 14 | Analyses of the methods written in the fields of theory |
Week 15 | Presentation |
Week 16 | General Exam |
Assesment methods
Course activities | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Attendance | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
Assignments | 0 | 0 |
Presentation | 1 | 40 |
Project | 0 | 0 |
Seminar | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 |
Final exam | 1 | 60 |
Total | 100 | |
Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 40 |
Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 0 | 60 |
Total | 100 |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
---|---|---|---|
Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 4 | 56 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 14 | 8 | 112 |
Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 8 | 112 |
Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 1 | 30 | 30 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms (Study duration) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 15 | 15 |
Total Workload | 44 | 65 | 325 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. They have upper level institutional and practical knowledge containing current information on composition and relevant areas | X | ||||
2. They comprehend art and composition in a level to discuss and redirect them in social, cultural, political and economic frame. | X | ||||
3. They grasp interdisciplinary interaction to the extent to reach new concepts and synthesises. | X | ||||
4. They develop and document innovative research methods on artistic production through experimental and creative processes. | X | ||||
5. They produce or interpret the original work in the quantity to be accepted by art and science evaluation boards. | X | ||||
6. They have the ability to share their original Works related to their fields with society and evaluate results. | X | ||||
7. They plan and execute group projects. | X | ||||
8. They develop new thoughts and methods bringing solution to their fields | X | ||||
9. They have qualification to contact with society by means of their original Works. | X | ||||
10. They initiate and direct academic discussions, transferring their thoughts to the experts of their fields efficiently. | X | ||||
11. They communicate via at least one foreign language verbally and in writing. | X | ||||
12. They contribute in public awareness process on the protection and recognition of cultural and artistic values | X | ||||
13. They make contribution to the activities raising awareness on directing contribution of art on society. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest