MAB763 - MICROECONOMIC APPLICATIONS
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICROECONOMIC APPLICATIONS | MAB763 | 1st Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Prequisites | None | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Must | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Department Staff | |||||
| Course objective | Aim of the course within the framework of micro-economic theory of the state in economic life by checking the primary sources to examine interventions. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Covered in this course; Market Failures: Government Intervention Rationality, Public Failures: The Rationality of the market, the State Greatness Measurement, Public Sector Growth of the Constitutional Deviations and Fiscal Illusion, Bureaucratic Efficiency, Public Expenditure Decisions Solutions, Privatization, Economic Consequences of Financing of Public Sector, Public Sector and freedom. | |||||
| References | Cullis G. J. ve P.R. Jones (1987) Microeconomics and Public Economy: A Defence of Leviathan. Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Market Failures |
| Week 2 | Market Failures: Rationality of Government Intervention |
| Week 3 | Public Failures: The Market Solution |
| Week 4 | Measuring greatness of the State |
| Week 5 | Mid-term exam |
| Week 6 | Public Sector Growth |
| Week 7 | Bureaucratic Inefficiency |
| Week 8 | Constitutional Deviation |
| Week 9 | Fiscal Illusion |
| Week 10 | Mid-term exam |
| Week 11 | Public Expenditure |
| Week 12 | Public Expenditure Decisions Custom Solutions |
| Week 13 | Privatization |
| Week 14 | The Economic Consequences of the Public Sector Financing |
| Week 15 | Public Sector and Freedom |
| Week 16 | General examination |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 2 | 50 |
| Final exam | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 2 | 50 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 50 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 14 | 5 | 70 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 38 | 38 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Total Workload | 30 | 106 | 210 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. The student deepens the actual and advanced knowledge in his/her field by leaning to his/her graduate competence, reaches original definations to bring innovation to his/her field. The student realized interdisciplinary interaction andcome to original conclusions by using expert's knowledge in analysis, synthesis and evaluation of new and complex ideas. | X | ||||
| 2. The student has knowledge and interpretation skills about economic and fiscal phases of societies and relations between societies. | X | ||||
| 3. The student has the skill of knowledge transferring the knowledge in his/her filed. | X | ||||
| 4. The student has mastered basic knowledge of statistics and processes of reasonning which are necessary for his/her field. | X | ||||
| 5. The student has skills of analyzing teh knowledge he/she acquired in his/her field, interpreting and evaluating them using the knowledge he/she brought from other fields, making suggestions for solution, evaluating critical approaches. Within the process he/she behaves in harmony with cultural, scientific and ethical values. | X | ||||
| 6. The student can prepare reports and works inaccordance with academic rules in the light of the knowledge he/she acquired in his/her field. | X | ||||
| 7. The student produces new information by interpreting the acqired knowledge. He/she makes original presentations in national and/or international meetings, has published at least one article as an individual or within the team. | X | ||||
| 8. The student aware of the continuity of education an learning. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest