EPO799 - PREPARATION TO DOCTORAL PROFICIENCY
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PREPARATION TO DOCTORAL PROFICIENCY | EPO799 | 4th Semester | 0 | 4 | 2 | 30 |
| Prequisites | Having completed the must PhD courses | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Must | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Other: Individual Study | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Faculty members and lecturer | |||||
| Course objective | Student's fulfillment of the required activities and shortage of knowledge for the doctoral proficiency examination comprising written and oral dimensions | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | Individual study to pass the doctoral proficiency examination | |||||
| References | All the references related to the program. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Examination and verification of program outcomes |
| Week 2 | The definition of scientific preparation activities for the doctoral proficienc exam. |
| Week 3 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 4 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 5 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 6 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 7 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 8 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 9 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 10 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 11 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 12 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 13 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 14 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 15 | Individual study, meeting and consulting with the advisor |
| Week 16 | Doctoral prroficiency exam |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 0 | 0 |
| Final exam | 1 | 100 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 0 | 0 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 100 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 900 | 900 |
| Total Workload | 1 | 900 | 900 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Able to analyze and evaluate the basic concepts, principles and theories of curriculum development in a historical process. | X | ||||
| 2. Able to analyze the basic concepts, principles and theories of teaching-learning processes. | X | ||||
| 3. Able to produce his/her own unique approach by evaluating the basic concepts, principles and approaches of curriculum evaluation. | X | ||||
| 4. Able to apply the basic concepts and principles of scientific research methods to new problems. | X | ||||
| 5. Able to carry out a research both individually and with a team in accordance with the required principles. | X | ||||
| 6. Able to determine the standards and make accreditation of curricula by conducting job and work analysis. | X | ||||
| 7. Able to guide the students to gain the required strategies that promotes learning. | X | ||||
| 8. Able to utilize both nationally and internationally available literature effectively to obtain professional development. | X | ||||
| 9. Able to cooperate with colleagues at national and international level. | X | ||||
| 10. Able to fulfill the mission of social service, instruction and research effectively. | X | ||||
| 11. Able to produce solutions to the country?s problems in curriculum development and instruction. | X | ||||
| 12. Able to use ICT effectively in his/her life to ensure professional development. | X | ||||
| 13. Able to use a foreign language effectively in his/her field at the level of C1 to ensure professional development. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest