KHK630 - COMPROMISE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW
| Course Name | Code | Semester | Theory (hours/week) |
Application (hours/week) |
Credit | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMPROMISE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW | KHK630 | 1st Semester | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| Prequisites | none | |||||
| Course language | Turkish | |||||
| Course type | Elective | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face-to-Face | |||||
| Learning and teaching strategies | Lecture Discussion | |||||
| Instructor (s) | Prof. Çetin ARSLAN | |||||
| Course objective | The aim of the course is to provide legal advice to solve the disputes in the alternative level where the parties can save time and money by examining the alternative dispute resolution methods and especially the compromise methods in the criminal procedure law. | |||||
| Learning outcomes |
| |||||
| Course Content | It relates to the alternative dispute resolution methods in the criminal procedure law and especially to the compromise methods in the criminal procedure law. | |||||
| References | Yenisey, Feridun. Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Uzlaşma, Arıkan Yayınları, İstanbul 2005. Zafer, Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Özeleşme Eğilimi: Uzlaşma, Prof. Dr. Ergun Önen?e Armağan, İstanbul 2003, (s. 727-750). Zafer, Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Fail-Mağdur Uzlaşması, (TCK 78/3), Maltepe Üniversitesi, HFD (Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi), V, 2 (2006), (s.117- 141). İpek, Ali İhsan/ Parlak, Engin Ceza Muhakemesinde Uzlaşma, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2016. | |||||
Course outline weekly
| Weeks | Topics |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Alternative Dispute Resolution Routes |
| Week 2 | Legal Development of Reconciliation |
| Week 3 | Purpose and Benefits of Reconciliation |
| Week 4 | Assessment of Reconciliation in Terms of Prison Law and Procedural Law |
| Week 5 | Conditions of Reconciliation |
| Week 6 | Reconciliation Procedure |
| Week 7 | Crimes in the Context of Compromise in Turkish Law |
| Week 8 | Midterm |
| Week 9 | Victim-Convict Mediation in Turkish Law- Settlement |
| Week 10 | Reconciliation During Investigation |
| Week 11 | Court Conciliation |
| Week 12 | Reconciliation Negotiations |
| Week 13 | Reconciliation with Similar Institutions |
| Week 14 | Legal Consequences of Reconciliation, Settlement Report Review and Settlement |
| Week 15 | General examination |
| Week 16 | General examination |
Assesment methods
| Course activities | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 |
| Assignments | 0 | 0 |
| Presentation | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms | 1 | 40 |
| Final exam | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
| Percentage of semester activities contributing grade succes | 1 | 40 |
| Percentage of final exam contributing grade succes | 1 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | |
WORKLOAD AND ECTS CALCULATION
| Activities | Number | Duration (hour) | Total Work Load |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Duration (x14) | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Specific practical training | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field activities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Study Hours Out of Class (Preliminary work, reinforcement, ect) | 11 | 8 | 88 |
| Presentation / Seminar Preparation | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homework assignment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Midterms (Study duration) | 1 | 50 | 50 |
| Final Exam (Study duration) | 1 | 60 | 60 |
| Total Workload | 27 | 121 | 240 |
Matrix Of The Course Learning Outcomes Versus Program Outcomes
| D.9. Key Learning Outcomes | Contrubition level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. Has the ability to access to sources of information, use, compare, interpret, infer and apply scientific data. | X | ||||
| 2. Has the knowledge on science of law and legal systems and the historical development of the rights of individuals and societies and the basic texts adopted in that process, and has the historical knowledge to interpret the achievements of modern law. | X | ||||
| 3. Masters the provisions regulating the relationships between persons and the state and has the ability to interpret those provisions. | X | ||||
| 4. Has the ability to use information technologies and course materials in the process of teaching and learning. | X | ||||
| 5. Has the ability to solve current legal problems in the framework of modern legal approaches. | X | ||||
| 6. Has a level of understanding and knowledge of the profession in order to reflect all of the features required by the profession in the best possible way at national and international levels. | X | ||||
| 7. Masters the legal regulations and practices on economic and financial mechanisms. | X | ||||
| 8. Has the ability to be able to express herself/himself as an individual and in front of a community. | X | ||||
| 9. Has the ability to use, compare and apply the knowledge of universal law. | X | ||||
| 10. Has the ability to understand and process national and international dimensions of law by following the case law and legal practices. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest